How to Write a Summary of an Article? Johan Hattingh and Me. This Report consists of 98 pages in total, including the Executive SummaryBibliography and Addendas.
Given the mounting negative evidence about the nuclear industry, it is concerning that so many world political, scientific and economic leaders continue to promote the industry. Sir Mark Oliphant, below one of the founders of the atomic bomb, was one who had the courage to change his mind, and to speak out against nuclear power and nuclear weapons.
Is it that so much of their reputation, their work has already been invested in nuclear? This is an oxymoron, perhaps.
Ethics is all about good and evil. But not necessarily good and evil people. Well intentioned people can do evil things, often in their belief that the final result is worth the evil done on the way.
Nuclear power proponents speak from their value systems, and may indeed be well-intentioned persons. Values such as providing huge amounts of energy, promoting economic growth, providing national defense, can make nuclear power and nuclear weapons look ethical.
But are nuclear power and nuclear weapons, in the long run, good or evil? Nuclear Weapons — At What Price? Peace, sustainable human development and the integrity of creation must be given priority over an arms industry that monopolizes capital and perpetuates profound insecurity.
The sacredness of human life and the rest of creation make the development, maintenance, threats to use and use of nuclear weapons a deep affront to morality.
The human community is obliged to redirect of our pursuit of security. No one will be secure until we all are secure. Seen in this light, then it is OK to promote some convenient lies.
But is it ethical? Two big lies are now being sold to the public: Clearly the nuclear fuel cycle, in its entirety, is a huge producer of greenhouse gases.
And, clearly, even if thousands of nuclear plants were to be built, and really did reduce greenhouse gas emissions, this would take decades, and be too late to prevent climate change.
This is probably because uranium mining goes on usually in rural and remote areas, with indigenous populations. The staggeringly unethical aspect of nuclear wastes is that the problem is to be left for future humans.
Very reluctantly, very late, some governments have offered some acknowledgment, some compensation. But still, most of these victims are ignored. Today, the British government doggedly pursues delaying tactics, so that the affected people, especially soldiers, are dying off before they could make claims.
The injustices of the past are joined today by the injustices continuing in Iraq and Afghanistan, where populations are affected by the radioactive effects of depleted uranium weapons. Nuclear waste disposal is a prime example of this. How little information is filtered out to the general public — about the dumping of nuclear wastes in the ocean, even in the Mediterranean.
Secrecy, unfortunately, is a close relative of corruption. An interesting example of this has been the recent scandal in Britain, over the taking of body parts from dead nuclear workers, without the permission of their families.
The mainstream media focused on the privacy aspects of this, and on how the government apologised to the families. The research was part of the program to discredit claims of harm done from nuclear radiation. The results of the body parts research were covered up, ad the body tissues destroyed — destroying any evidence.
These thinkers entirely built their theories upon a simple stratagem: Never before has a society destroyed so many resources. The best example of the way we mortgaged the future is nuclear waste, the most dangerous kind of trash. As yet, there is no way to warn our descendants to keep away from it………….
Plutonium has a half life of years.Nuclear power plants operate reliably and have a continuous output of leslutinsduphoenix.com plants do not generally face operations and maintenance problems. This is a contrast to other alternative energies which depend on the activity of the weather.
Nuclear power plants like the Fukushima Daiichi plant in the towns of Futaba and Ohkuma, Japan produced substantial electricity for surrounding areas (Nuclear / TEPCO Power Plants, n.d.) and was one of the largest and most productive nuclear power plants in the world.
Viewpoint The ethics of nuclear power: Social experiments, intergenerational justice, and emotions Behnam Taebin, Sabine Roeser, Ibo van de Poel Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, BX Delft, The Netherlands.
The March , Tohoku earthquake, tsunami, and Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, like Chernobyl before it, brought into sharp relief the ethical issues that surround the management of technological risk and the fragility of nuclear power plants. This program rerouted funding from nuclear weapons to nuclear power (leslutinsduphoenix.com).
Once into the s, the technology was ready to be used commercially. Some of the nuclear reactors designed by General Electric and Westinghouse were in use until the s (leslutinsduphoenix.com).
The Ethics of Nuclear Power AM, August 6, residents of the city of Hiroshima, Japan saw a bright flash of light said to be ten times brighter than the sun, a 3/5(1).